ANAS OUTSTANDING TEACHER AWARD
INSTRUCTOR:
GRADE LEVEL:
PROJECT TITLE:
EVALUATOR/ DATE:
|
| JUDGING CRITERIA |
Exceptional |
Very Good |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Unable to Evaluate |
| |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
| One-page description of teacher's accomplishments in science teaching. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Two letters of recommendation from individuals that have observed science teaching. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desired learning outcomes stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Appropriate for content, desired learning outcomes, class size and level of students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project communicated clearly and effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Uses educational materials or technology effectively to enhance learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporates appropriate knowledge or research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Organization helps students link learning from other content areas to current project. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporates appropriate safety procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluates student learning effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presents problems that allow students to improve critical thinking or models critical thinking skills. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Respects individual differences and opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Helps students identify appropriate resources for solving problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Impression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL (MAXIMUM OF 70):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS:
|